Sjors Provoost
1w ago
It seems there's no free lunch... (see first comment)
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/125952/can-zkp-support-make-pqc-schemes-more-block-space-and-validation-time-efficient
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/125952/can-zkp-support-make-pqc-schemes-more-block-space-and-validation-time-efficient
See translation
2
1
0
0
0
Replies
tj24hours
@tj24hours
1w ago
DOES IT MAKE SENSE, LIKE YOU REFERENCED, TO USE LARGE & SLOW INITIALLY THEN IMPROVE LATER? HOW MUCH WOULD THIS CHANGE THE LANDSCAPE FOR NODES & WALLETS?
See translation
1
0
0
0
0
Sjors Provoost
@provoost
1w ago
The problem is that *if* quantum theft becomes a real threat, people are going to rush to the exit. If at that point we only have large & slow, it just means the majority is screwed. Which would probably crash the price, so then everyone is screwed.
See translation
0
1
0
0
0