Show thread history
Kanzan
1w ago
there are various theories about what the "sweet spot" might be.
as i understand
½ to ⅓ the yearly amount of gold supply inflation is Generally Regarded as Safe, while still replacing lost coins and discouraging hoarding.
as i understand
½ to ⅓ the yearly amount of gold supply inflation is Generally Regarded as Safe, while still replacing lost coins and discouraging hoarding.
See translation
1
3
0
0
44
Replies
YODL
@YODL
1w ago
Ah, that's very reasonable. The ocd in me is slightly bothered by the lost coins thing with BTC.
See translation
2
3
0
0
0
OceanSlim
@OceanSlim
1w ago
Who cares about lost coins? Infinitly divisible. If they're truly lost, yours just become worth more.
See translation
1
3
0
0
0
YODL
@YODL
1w ago
It's more ocd than anything, only care a little. And I don't think it's infinitely divisible without a hard fork, but I get your point
See translation
1
1
0
0
0
OceanSlim
@OceanSlim
1w ago
No. Bitcoin has always been infinitly divisible and is already divided into millisats for lightning network fees.
See translation
1
2
0
0
0
YODL
@YODL
1w ago
Nothing smaller than 1 sat on chain. Didn't know millisats was a thing yet, had heard it was possible once and that it may involve probabilistic ownership or something like that.
See translation
1
1
0
0
0
02 more reply(ies)
Resonance Cascade The II
@Resonance Cascade The II
1w ago
It bothers you, because you care
See translation
0
1
0
0
0