Kanzan

4d ago

nobody tell Slim about how gold failed as a SoV because of supply inflation 🙄

precious metals companies are literally stealing my time from me!

OceanSlim

•

4d ago

Adding a tail emissions to pay miners is exactly like printing money to pay bond holders. Congrats Monero.

See translation

See translation

12
6
0
0
0

•

•

•


Do you have thoughts?

Log in to leave a comment


Replies

OceanSlim

@OceanSlim

3d ago

Good did fail as a SoV... Also, something with fixed should will always store value better than something that has an ever increasing supply. That's pretty simple economics.

See translation

1

0
0
0
0

•

•

•

Kanzan

@Kanzan

3d ago

gold is still an SoV after 5000 years.

a fixed hard cap is just bad monetary policy.

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

•

•

•

YODL

@YODL

♥︎ by author

4d ago

What's the tail emission now, .6 per 2 min block?
Why not 0.61? What is the rationale if you don't mind me asking?

See translation

1

2
0
0
0

•

•

•

Kanzan

@Kanzan

4d ago

there are various theories about what the "sweet spot" might be.

as i understand
½ to ⅓ the yearly amount of gold supply inflation is Generally Regarded as Safe, while still replacing lost coins and discouraging hoarding.

See translation

1

3
0
0
44

•

•

•

YODL

@YODL

4d ago

Ah, that's very reasonable. The ocd in me is slightly bothered by the lost coins thing with BTC.

See translation

2

3
0
0
0

•

•

•

OceanSlim

@OceanSlim

3d ago

Who cares about lost coins? Infinitly divisible. If they're truly lost, yours just become worth more.

See translation

1

3
0
0
0

•

•

•

YODL

@YODL

3d ago

It's more ocd than anything, only care a little. And I don't think it's infinitely divisible without a hard fork, but I get your point

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

•

•

•

04 more reply(ies)

Resonance Cascade The II

@Resonance Cascade The II

4d ago

It bothers you, because you care

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

•

•

•