Show thread history
Detective Deft Defector
2mo ago
I don't buy the 6102 in that idea. not only could the government not physically take the corn, but Saylor and especially Black Rock wouldn't let them. there is more power in the economic realm than we might realize.
It also seems like there's no guarantee a nation would be psychologically transformed like an individual would be, at least in the short and probably medium term. They're used to having power and authority. What the medium is to exercise that power means little so long as the same sadistic narcissists who gravitate to positions of authority do so.
In the long term I definitely see it changing nations as it enables and incentivizes a meritocratic rule of law.
It also seems like there's no guarantee a nation would be psychologically transformed like an individual would be, at least in the short and probably medium term. They're used to having power and authority. What the medium is to exercise that power means little so long as the same sadistic narcissists who gravitate to positions of authority do so.
In the long term I definitely see it changing nations as it enables and incentivizes a meritocratic rule of law.
See translation
1
0
0
0
0
Replies
Cody
@Cody
2mo ago
Why would Saylor and Black Rock put up any fight at all? They will still be guaranteed power and wealth in some way.
The banks could have told the gov to GFY when they did the original 6102......but did they?.....no,
The banks could have told the gov to GFY when they did the original 6102......but did they?.....no,
See translation
0
0
0
0
0