fiatjaf

Dec 11, 2024

Quantum computers are never going to happen.

See translation

93
109
6
1
315


Do you have thoughts?

Log in to leave a comment


Replies

EVAN KALOUDIS

@EVAN KALOUDIS

2w ago

Good* quantum computers are never going to happen.

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

Juma Jim’s

@Juma

2w ago

You can just say anything as allo

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Momo Tahmasbi

@momotahmasbi

2w ago

In what sense? QCs have existed since the 90s. But if you mean in the sense that we’re never gonna be able to break ECDSA, you might end up being right. Or maybe you mean they won’t happen in our lifetime and you might be still right. But giant leaps always happen and we shouldn’t let our guards down.

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

metadavid

@metadavid

2w ago

Coming in hot!

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

0xcbdc

@0xcbdc

2w ago

True

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Weatherall

@Weatherall

2w ago

"quantum" is what happens when your basic materialist reductionist theor about the electron is destroyed by the double-slit, and rather than admit that you are a dumb materialist asshole who cant grasp the mysterium tremendum of Gods creation, you just dig in deeper to your own anyichrost metaphysical delusion ...

it ends in insanity - in a nursing home - doped up by the state...

enjoy your short life on the outside cuz yer all-in.

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Weatherall

@Weatherall

2w ago

look closely at the IDOL worship of these mainstream media programmed fucking idiots that think they are hip, cutting edge and smart!

you are all assholes.

#christisking and you are lost sheep without him... totall subject to lies, grift, and other machinations of the devil.



See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Weatherall

@Weatherall

2w ago

💯🎯

Thank you.

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Creediator

@creediator

2w ago

This thread tells me the world has so many quantum experts.

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

CensorThis

@ToxicFemininity

2w ago

Why’s that?

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

cr0bar

@cr0bar

Dec 12, 2024

I believe they both will and won’t.

See translation

3

4
0
0
121

Momo Tahmasbi

@momotahmasbi

2w ago

🤣🤣🤣

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

First Man Photography

@adamkarnacz

2w ago

Congratulations. 👏🏼

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

royster⚡️🌲🌽🗽

@royster

2w ago

Solid take

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

roya ୨୧

@roya ୨୧

Dec 12, 2024

what is it

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

gbs

@gbs

Dec 12, 2024

I was on a pos-quantum cryptographic PhD defense yesterday and I heard the following sentence:

“We are 10y away from quantum computing… by the last 30y”

See translation

1

3
1
0
0

mleku

@mleku

Dec 12, 2024

global warming is always going to happen in 10 years too, and is also a total black hole of money

See translation

2

5
0
0
0

gbs

@gbs

Dec 12, 2024

yes, of course; a pretty good way to get funding from the cathedral.

See translation

1

2
0
0
0

mleku

@mleku

Dec 12, 2024

that's what it is, a VC funding racket, exactly

the physics of making the superconductive transister it requires involves so much energy it's absolutely insane, and they have barely raised the minimum temp required by like 10% in 30 years

See translation

0

3
0
0
0

calle 👁️⚡👁️

@calle 👁️⚡👁️

Dec 12, 2024

They will.

See translation

1

1
0
0
14

Mnm

@Mnm

Dec 12, 2024

Or they won't and they will simultaneously.

See translation

0

5
0
0
0

ṩт∆nция тōⲕ¥ō

@ṩт∆nция тōⲕ¥ō

Dec 12, 2024

given that we are in the time dimension, all our computations are linear. in all competent science fiction novels, if quantum computing technologies figure into the narrative, they take place outside our dimension.

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Relatively Irrelevant

@relativelyirrelevant

Dec 12, 2024

Quantum computers are either going to happen or not happen; at the same time.

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

Emergent Behaviours

@Emergent Behaviours

Dec 12, 2024

OK BOOMER

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Symbiolosopher

@Symbiolosopher

Dec 12, 2024

Quantum physics is pseudo science.

See translation

2

3
0
0
0

Weatherall

@Weatherall

2w ago

finally someone who knows!

followed!

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

Abstract Equilibrium

@Abstract Equilibrium

Dec 12, 2024

"If there's only one slit, you must acquit"

"If the slits double, you may be in trouble"

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

Radar 𓅦

@radar

Dec 12, 2024

They gave it that name just to gourmetize only. 😅

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

dextryz

@dextryz

Dec 12, 2024

Having worked as a Quantum developer for over 5 years; Has to go back to academia first. The industry is delusional

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

Sato

@Sato

Dec 11, 2024

decade old wallets being drained
just a coincidence

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

ContrarianAgrarian

@ContrarianAgrarian

Dec 11, 2024

9 weeks before the Wright brothers did it the ‘experts’ said it would take tremendous time and advancements to figure flight out



el

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Seth

@seth

Dec 11, 2024

It’s the new flying car. 60-80 years maybe

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

ding ding and 21 others

@ding ding

Dec 11, 2024

TARS was based

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

MAHDOOD and 69 others

@MAHDOOD and 69 others

Dec 11, 2024

I think they’ll get close and call it a quantum computer like they did with AI. We don’t have real AI.

See translation

2

3
0
0
0

node

@node

Dec 12, 2024

Agreed. It’s a very efficient search engine. But that’s it

See translation

1

0
0
0
0

MAHDOOD and 69 others

@MAHDOOD and 69 others

Dec 12, 2024

Yeah you can tell it doesn’t actually understand what you’re asking it to do. Still very useful but not AI.

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

node

@node

Dec 12, 2024

It’s getting better. The new gpt came along way. But not to the point where it fully understands. You need to correct it quite a bit.

See translation

2

0
0
0
0

MAHDOOD and 69 others

@MAHDOOD and 69 others

Dec 12, 2024

Yea complete understanding is probably impossible. I asked it if there was a research evidence that supports the benefits of stretching. It started giving all these explanations for why stretching is good for you. I asked for evidence from actual studies. It gave me the studies and the results below each study. The studies said the evidence for the benefits of stretching was inconclusive. Not very intelligent. It’s really like an advanced form of Google.

See translation

1

2
0
0
0

23 more reply(ies)

node

@node

Dec 12, 2024

*a long

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Sachin

@Sachin

Dec 12, 2024

But it begs the question what do we mean by REAL?

el

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

MAHDOOD and 69 others

@MAHDOOD and 69 others

Dec 12, 2024

el

See translation

1

3
0
0
500

Sachin

@Sachin

Dec 12, 2024



el

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

MAHDOOD and 69 others

@MAHDOOD and 69 others

Dec 12, 2024

Noooooooooooooo 💀😂

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Kevin Ravens₿erg ⚡️ ☁️

@Kevin Ravens₿erg

Dec 11, 2024

Your brain is an entangled quantum transceiver.

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

The Marie ⚡️🦂

@The Marie

Dec 11, 2024

Wanna bet, put your bitcoin where you mouth is

See translation

1

3
0
0
0

sitting at an airport bar

@ArtSetsYouFree

Dec 11, 2024

Everyone is….

See translation

0

2
0
0
0

Luxas

@Luxas

Dec 11, 2024

They've both happened and not happened at the same time 🫨

See translation

1

2
0
0
0

ContrarianAgrarian

@ContrarianAgrarian

Dec 11, 2024

Ha! I see what you did there

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

Eshara

@Eshara

Dec 11, 2024

My psychic senses are saying that’s not true 🫂🔥

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

CitizenPleb

@CitizenPleb

Dec 11, 2024

How come?

See translation

2

0
0
0
0

a source familiar with the matter

@a source familiar with the matter

2w ago

a source familiar with the matter

3w ago

The Backwardness of Quantum Mechanics

There's a famous series of experiments in which light is projected through a number of slits cut into a material.

With one slit, the light projects in a relatively flat pattern believed to be consistent with the behavior of particles but not waves.

With multiple slits, the lights forms an interference pattern believed to be consistent with the behavior of waves but not particles.

The standard interpretation in physics is that light is both a wave and a particle.

A more sound intepretation in my view is that light is NEITHER a wave nor a particle. One experiment rules out one, and the other experiment rules out the other.
This is the proper scientific method, in which an experiment disproves a theory of the world we had assembled based on observation, rather than (erroneously) confirming multiple incompatible theories despite known contradictory evidence.

See translation

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Weatherall

@Weatherall

2w ago

because the world doesnt work based on your metaphysical mental masturbations thats fucking why.

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

CitizenPleb

@CitizenPleb

2w ago

Keep my mental masturbations out of this

See translation

2

2
0
0
0

Weatherall

@Weatherall

2w ago

i might consider that - if only you didnt leave your wadded up kleenexes all over the fucking town square.

See translation

1

2
0
0
0

CitizenPleb

@CitizenPleb

2w ago

😂🤣

See translation

1

2
0
0
0

02 more reply(ies)

atyh

@atyh

2w ago

“mental masturbations.
everywhere, mental masturbations.”
— Pladoh

See translation

0

1
0
0
0