Show thread history
vinney
2mo ago
The Amber implementation of it has worked quite well for me.
That said, I have no idea what it's doing under the hood...
That said, I have no idea what it's doing under the hood...
See translation
1
1
0
0
0
Replies
jb55
@jb55
2mo ago
i didn't think amber was nsecbunker
See translation
1
0
0
0
0
d0enakalle🐇⚡
@d0enakalle🐇⚡
2mo ago
It offers adding new connections like this:
And then it uses specific relays. Standard is relay.nsec.app
And then it uses specific relays. Standard is relay.nsec.app
See translation
1
0
0
0
0
jb55
@jb55
2mo ago
bizarre it would need to do this, I thought signing stayed on device? why does it need to go to the internet and back just to sign?
See translation
3
0
0
0
0
Dikaios1517
@Dikaios1517
♥︎ by author
2mo ago
Amber can do entirely local signing using NIP-55, but it also supports remote signing via NIP-46. It uses relays to transfer the unsigned data to Amber, then the data is signed locally and transferred back to the client via relays. The relays used can be selected by the user and can even use a local relay, such as Citrine.
That said, even using Amber for NIP-46 signing has been spotty for me. Not sure why. It is using a similar concept as Nostr Wallet Connect, which has always worked quite well, but remote signing often just fails for some reason.
That said, even using Amber for NIP-46 signing has been spotty for me. Not sure why. It is using a similar concept as Nostr Wallet Connect, which has always worked quite well, but remote signing often just fails for some reason.
See translation
0
1
0
0
0
vinney
@vinney
2mo ago
Maybe just to provide another option for apps that expect this kind of signing?
See translation
0
0
0
0
0
d0enakalle🐇⚡
@d0enakalle🐇⚡
2mo ago
PABLOF7z
@PABLOF7z
2mo ago
amber supports nip-46 and nip-55
you can use nip-46 with amber via a localhost relay too
you can use nip-46 with amber via a localhost relay too
See translation
1
4
2
0
0
01 more reply(ies)