Show thread history
scuffed
4w ago
Olympus/Zeus, LNServer, and FlashSats all pass the sniff test. LQWD has some twitter posts praising Taproot, but I can't find a definitive answer on if they use it or not. Megalith is by far the most obvious Taproot shill, as you mentioned.
See translation
1
0
0
0
720
Replies
mleku
@mleku
4w ago
i'm not against using taproot, and it really bugs me that simple nostr-style schnorr signatures got introduced to bitcoin protocol in association with this retarded "contract address" tweaks thing
it's like, bro, tweaking pubkeys based on the secret is not a protocol matter, tweak is nothing, taproot the whole name is basically all about this whole thing of "omg we can use hash to modify a secret key and allow multiple addresses to be understood by one wallet"
yeah, like a HD keychain (yes, taproot is basically a form of HD keychain protocol)
but the signatures and pubkeys are just fucking the fucking same as fucking nostr signatures
you see how they have muddled the two concepts together?
the real valuable thing that schnorr signatures enable is signature aggregation, so it allows such things as threshold protocols and multisig that
it's like, bro, tweaking pubkeys based on the secret is not a protocol matter, tweak is nothing, taproot the whole name is basically all about this whole thing of "omg we can use hash to modify a secret key and allow multiple addresses to be understood by one wallet"
yeah, like a HD keychain (yes, taproot is basically a form of HD keychain protocol)
but the signatures and pubkeys are just fucking the fucking same as fucking nostr signatures
you see how they have muddled the two concepts together?
the real valuable thing that schnorr signatures enable is signature aggregation, so it allows such things as threshold protocols and multisig that
... See more
See translation
0
0
0
0
0