Show thread history

StackinBeets

1w ago

Congratulations @KN6ZZV
Thanks for the membership @SATOSH.EE
I don't know why there was no mention of some people who voted for me though so I'll thank them here myself:
@⚡️DEFAUXKING⚡️
@Yourmomscat
@MAHDOOD

See translation

5
5
0
0
222


Do you have thoughts?

Log in to leave a comment


Replies

Yourmomscat

@Yourmomscat

1w ago

Woohoo!! dm'd you back!!

See translation

1

1
0
0
21

StackinBeets

@StackinBeets

1w ago

? I did not receive a DM from you

See translation

2

0
0
0
0

⚡️DEFAUXKING⚡️

@DEFAUXKING

1w ago

lol she meant to reply to Satoshee

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

StackinBeets

@StackinBeets

1w ago

Ah ok 😁 hope you guys won a gift card!

See translation

1

0
0
0
0

⚡️DEFAUXKING⚡️

@DEFAUXKING

1w ago

Yeah she is one of the lucky winners it seems. My girl always has had a knack of plucking four leaf clovers 🍀

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

01 more reply(ies)

MAHDOOD

@MAHDOOD

1w ago

Did my vote count at least?

See translation

2

2
0
0
0

SATOSH.EE

@Satoshee

1w ago

Yes 😉

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

StackinBeets

@StackinBeets

1w ago

It did apparently, even though they had to scavenge through some metadata. Thanks for your time!

See translation

0

1
0
0
0

SATOSH.EE

@Satoshee

1w ago

Correction: the regular price of the Gold membership on SATOSH.EE is approx. 42,000 sats

See translation

0

0
0
0
0

Kontext

@Kontext

1w ago

For some reason a number of zaps did not show up on any #nostr clients, as a result some votes were initially counted as void. I was able to find a bunch of uncounted zaps on the LN node and looking into the metadata, it looks like the accounts you referenced did, in fact, make qualifying zaps.

Apologies for the confusion, I'm not sure why the zaps didn't show up on nostr. Taking those votes into account, the end result remains the same though.

I will be looking into streamlining the voting (and vote counting process) for the next contest and perhaps temporarily reduce the vote weight of myself / Satoshee staff and sponsor companies for the next contest (or until we get a larger number of people voting) in order to not make the end result that heavily dependent on just a few people's votes.

... See more

See translation

1

3
0
0
0

StackinBeets

@StackinBeets

1w ago

Thank you for clarifying.
I think the voting weight is fine like it is actually, I would even go so far as to say remove unaffiliated votes altogether, and let only the sponsor and you guys decide. My reasoning behind it being that the artist shouldn't have to worry about rallying votes and focus on the art instead.

See translation

1

3
0
0
21

Kontext

@Kontext

1w ago

Well, the artist doesn't necessarily *have to* rally votes unless they want to...

For these public contests, I would like to keep involving other people in the whole process starting from determining the total size of the prize to the proposals to the choosing process. Another, slightly different aspect of the initiative will be completely privately (between myself/the Satoshee company and the artist) agreed upon works as per the "Creation" section on the @Open Source Culture page:

"The Open Source Culture Fund will be used to commission new artworks to be created and released into the public domain.
This will be done in three ways:
1. Through direct, private arrangements between Satoshee Strategy and artists
2. Through public contests in which artists can submit offers as to what they would be willing to create for the public domain for a preset amount of BTC

... See more

See translation

1

1
0
0
0

StackinBeets

@StackinBeets

1w ago

Alright! I definitely appreciate with what you're doing here and I'm honored to be runner-up regardless, hope to join in the future!

See translation

0

0
0
0
0