Trey Walsh
2mo ago
The nail on the head of what draws me to damus.
I think will is being a bit too, idk, specific saying “technical” users because damus is still very accessible to non-technical users. Perhaps some “features” such as nwc, relay management etc could draw out more technical side of things.
But anyway…I’m here on nostr because of these values, not purely for a centralized social media xyz replacement or backup.
It’s tough to compare nostr to other things when implemented well, because it’s so different and never done before.
I think will is being a bit too, idk, specific saying “technical” users because damus is still very accessible to non-technical users. Perhaps some “features” such as nwc, relay management etc could draw out more technical side of things.
But anyway…I’m here on nostr because of these values, not purely for a centralized social media xyz replacement or backup.
It’s tough to compare nostr to other things when implemented well, because it’s so different and never done before.
npub1xtscy
•
2mo ago
Replying to @USER
instead of trying to constantly point this out all the time we are changing our focus to just promoting damus to technical users. I want to build tech for the people who appreciate nostr core values. this is still a large untapped market, and will allow us to focus on building value for those users instead of trying to compete with centralized features which won't be possible after awhile.
See translation
See translation
0
0
0
0
0
Replies
npub1xtscy
@npub1xtscy
2mo ago
Yeah technical users doesn’t mean bad ux. It’s just the features we’re building might be more interesting to people who care about clients that gives users agency and less reliance on centralized infrastructure. I believe this will lead to a more reliable experience, but it just may lack features only possible via proprietary relays.
See translation
0
0
0
0
0