📝 Summary: People are considering a smaller blocksize to address blockchain size concerns and promote the use of the lightning network. Cut-through transactions won't remove inscriptions, as the original transactions will still be accessible to full archival nodes.
👥 Authors:
• vjudeu at gazeta.pl ( @vjudeu at gazeta.pl [ARCHIVE] )
• Peter Todd ( @Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] )
• vjudeu at gazeta.pl ( @vjudeu at gazeta.pl [ARCHIVE] )
• Peter Todd ( @Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] )
📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-09-03 to 2023-09-06
✉️ Message Count: 3
📚 Total Characters in Messages: 9886
Messages Summaries
✉️ Message by vjudeu at gazeta.pl on 03/09/2023:
People may be more open to a smaller blocksize to address concerns about blockchain size and push more activity to the lightning network. Another approach called cut-through could remove inscriptions while keeping the payment intact.
People may be more open to a smaller blocksize to address concerns about blockchain size and push more activity to the lightning network. Another approach called cut-through could remove inscriptions while keeping the payment intact.
✉️ Message by Peter Todd on 05/09/2023:
Cut-through transactions will not eliminate inscriptions in the blockchain. Full archival nodes will still have access to the transaction data.
Cut-through transactions will not eliminate inscriptions in the blockchain. Full archival nodes will still have access to the transaction data.
✉️ Message by vjudeu at gazeta.pl on 06/09/2023:
Cut-through transactions will not affect inscriptions, as the original transactions still exist in the blockchain and can be accessed by full archival nodes.
Cut-through transactions will not affect inscriptions, as the original transactions still exist in the blockchain and can be accessed by full archival nodes.